About

Column


About this dashboard

  • Title: Financial vulnerability of Austrian households
  • Number: 5/2020
  • Date: June 22, 2020
  • Author: HFCS Team, OeNB (Austrian Central Bank) & Maximilian Propst (WU, Vienna)
  • Data: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB


What we do

  • This dashboard is the sixth in our series of Household Finance and Consumption Survey (HFCS) dashboards.
  • Each dashboard is designed to provide concise information on a specific topic.
  • All information displayed - be it figures, tables or text - is based on HFCS data.


Who we are

  • We are the HFCS team of the Oesterreichische Nationalbank (OeNB).
  • As such, we are tasked with collecting and analyzing data on Austrian households’ finances and consumption.
  • For more information on the HFCS in Austria, visit our website for the HFCS Austria.
  • For general information on the Eurosystem’s HFCS, visit the website of the ECB’s Household Finance and Consumption Network (HFCN).


How to contact us

Find out more by clicking on the Question tab!

Question

Question

Column


Question

How do Austrian households make ends meet?

To begin with, let us take a look at the specialist terms we will be using throughout the dashboard:


Terms revolving around income

Net household income = combined annual net income of all members of a household

Net household income includes:

  • income from labor (including employment and self-employment income);
  • income from real assets (e.g. through renting out real estate property), from financial assets (e.g. from saving accounts) or from private businesses;*
  • income from pensions or other social transfers (e.g. unemployment benefits or child-care benefits); and
  • income from other sources (e.g. private transfers).
  • Non-cash income (e.g. imputed rents) is not included.

**For income from real estate property and private businesses, we assume gross values to be equal to net values, since there are no net values in the HFCS.*

Decile = one of the values of a variable that divides the frequency distribution of the variable into 10 equal groups, so that each group represents 1/10 of the total population

  • Income deciles, for example, consist of 9 values that divide the household income distribution into 10 equal groups. Households with the smallest income lie in the 1st decile and those with the largest income lie in the 10th decile.

Equivalized net household income = net household income per consumption unit

  • To be able to compare household income, we need to adjust each household’s income for its size (= “equivalizing”). Two-or-more-person households can share some living costs (e.g. electricity or food costs). Moreover, children might not consume as much as adults. To take account of these differences in consumption, we defined consumption units based on the OECD-modified equivalence scale. According to this scale, the head of the household accounts for 1 consumption unit, and every additional household member older than 13 years for 0.5. Household members who are 13 years or younger account for 0.3 consumption units.


Terms revolving around vulnerability

At-risk-of-poverty households = households with a net income of less than 60% of the median equivalized net household income

Debt-to-income (DTI) ratio = sum of debt divided by total household income (gross, annual)

  • A household is considered as potentially financially vulnerable if its DTI ratio is greater than or equal to 3.

Debt-to-asset (DTA) ratio = sum of debt divided by total household assets

  • A household is considered as potentially financially vulnerable if its DTA ratio is greater than or equal to 0.75.


Main background facts for Austria

  • Net household income is more evenly distributed across Austria than net wealth.
  • Income from assets is more unequally distributed than income from labor.
  • Single-parent households are particularly financially vulnerable.
  • Households in western Austria can cover potential income losses longer than households in eastern Austria.
  • When in financial difficulties, Austrian households draw on their savings, if possible. Otherwise, they ask friends and family for help, rather than going into debt.

For detailed information on the methodology, please refer for the Austrian HFCS to the methodological notes and the first results and for the Eurosystem HFCS to the methodological report and the results report.

Column

is the median equalized net household income in Austria per month.

About EUR 1.900

How many households have higher expenditures than income?

How many of these households can cover higher expenditures using their savings?

Find out more by clicking on the Answer tabs!

Answers

Answer

How is household income distributed in Austria?

Source: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB.


The chart shows the mean net household income per year by income decile. For each decile, the mean net household income is broken down by types of income. Within each decile, one square represents EUR 100.


In the lowest decile, the mean net household income is about EUR 10,000. In the highest decile, it is close to EUR 100,000.


You can see that income from labor increases with each income decile. However, income from assets only accounts for a substantial part of household income in the highest decile.

Where do financially vulnerable households live?

Source: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB.


The map shows the number of months a median household would be able to compensate for potential income losses by drawing on its liquid assets. Liquid assets include savings in sight and savings accounts as well as bonds, mutual funds and stocks.


You can see that a median household in Tyrol would be able to make ends meet for more than half a year if it lost its income. In Styria, a median household could only stay afloat for about 3 months.


If you hover over the provinces, you will see the share of potentially financially vulnerable households according to standard thresholds (DTI ratio ≥ 3 and DTA ratio ≥ 0.75).

Which households are at risk of poverty?

Source: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB.


The chart shows equivalized income as a share of the median equivalized income for different households. A ratio of 1 means that a household has an equivalized income which corresponds to the median income. If a household has an equivalized income of less than 60% of the median income (ratio of 0.6, indicated by the orange line), it is at risk of poverty.


You can see that single-parent households are more likely to be financially vulnerable than other household types, since quite a few households can be found left of the orange line (ratio of below 0.6).


You can also see that 2-adult households without children have relatively high levels of income (ratio of well above 0.6).

Can friends and family help in an emergency?

Source: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB.


The bar chart shows, for 4 income groups, the share of households who reported that their expenditures had exceeded their income in the last 12 months. Moreover, it indicates how many of these households were able to borrow EUR 5,000 from friends or family in an emergency.


You can see that 20% of households with an income of less than 60% of the median income (at risk of poverty) got into financial difficulties. Two thirds of them said that they were not able to borrow EUR 5,000 from friends and family.


In the U.S., 40% of all households get into financial difficulties when faced with an unexpected expense of $ 400 (see FED 2019).

What happens in an emergency?

Source: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB.


The chart shows how households dealt with the fact that their expenditures had surpassed their income in the last 12 months.


You can see that households who were at risk of poverty asked friends and family for help or used their savings. Higher-income households were mostly able to solely rely on their savings.


The share of households who left bills unpaid was highest for households at risk of poverty. By contrast, households with incomes above twice the median income were more likely to use credit cards or overdraw their sight accounts.

Bonus material - 3D chart: What is the joint distribution of wealth, income and consumption in Austria?

Source: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB.


The chart shows the joint distribution of Austrian households’ net wealth, net income and consumption. The third dimension shows the (kernel) estimates for mean expenditures on consumption for each combination of income and net wealth.


The distribution of consumption is more equal than that of income or net wealth. In Austria, households with low income and low net wealth spend about EUR 600 on goods and services according to the HFCS. High-income and high-net-wealth households, on the other hand, spend about EUR 2,200 on average.


Note that several problems may occur when discussing the joint distribution of wealth, income and consumption (see Lindner and Schürz 2019).